So you claim the Convention of States Project is “double edged sword”?
The truth is, all law is a double edged sword when the Supreme Court can fabricate eisegesic interpretations of a law without fear of being held accountable. Eisegesic reading is to employ unintended, external meanings to a phrase, a meaning not based on original intent.
Exegesis legal reading – original intent – MUST be the ONLY basis for judiciary rulings, all lawyers and judges know this well, it’s obvious upon inspection. Except for activist judges – they pretend eisegesis interpretation is ok. They are lying. And they realized 100 years ago they can get away with it.
Thus the constitution is a double edged sword as well, in the hands of a corrupt justice. The founders knew the Constitution could be usurped, that’s why Mason had them include Article 5 to give the states the