NY Times Actually Asks, Which Is Worse: Nuclear Bomb or Climate Change?

The following excerpt is from an article that originally appeared on Newsbusters

If you’ve ever wondered how wildly out-of-touch the media is, look no further than The New York Times’ Twitter account. Friday morning, the leading newspaper in the country actually wondered if climate change would be a “greater threat” for the island of Guam than being hit with a nuclear bomb. The New York Times’ World section’s Twitter account proposed the ludicrous question earlier this morning, to much deserved backlash.


What’s a greater threat to Guam? North Korea, or climate change?

— New York Times World (@nytimesworld) August 11, 2017


Of course this did not go over well. Dozens of replies mocked the paper for making such an absurd comparison:

“Nobody can top stupidity of @AP asking IF we SHOULD stop nuclear warhead headed to Guam”@NYTimes “Hold my beer”

— BonkPolitics (@BonkPolitics) August 11, 2017


I’m gonna go with the mentally unstable North Korean dictator

Click here to Read this Entire Story on Newsbusters

This post was originally published on this site
Comments are closed.